I just want to slam that like button because I totally agree. It's all rational and justified, because of the olden times. All about doubting if a child was made in part when Rick fired one off, and not when some other guy fired one off. Which is mega important because other guys probably suck because they're not Rick, and Rick is such a premium specimen that, like, what if his bloodline isn't being continued enough??? People refuse to admit that, obviously, whether or not Rick's bloodline is being continued enough is really important to all of us and that's why culturally, women are shamed for having sex. It's science. I mean, it's science if we like the idea of that today. Sometimes, we don't like the idea of science because vaccines are scary. So if this is a day we don't like the idea of science, then it's not that. Or it is? It's just the kind that we like. Anyway, that's why men, who are all super rational forever, were HARDWIRED to call women sluts for big number years. Another big number that's conspicuously different and higher than the last one years will not change the hardwire, the wire is so hard, guys. This is what laymen do not understand, how hard the wire is. That's just science and rationality, and is also the olden times, which is also the now because that's how evolution is and science, probably. Anyhow, case closed, sluts.

Sounds a bit reaching. I think it has more to do with the fact that, sexually/romantically, men play the role of contestant vying for sex/love, while women play the role of selector granting or denying it. Also men are more driven by desire for sex with hot women, while women are more driven by the desire for love and security. So of course men would have sex with 150 women if they could, but for a woman to do that is unnatural. And these roles are products of evolution, so evolutionary psychology applies to this explanation too. It sounds like I'm slut shaming in my argument, but I'm not. IDGAF if women are promiscuous. I actually like the fact that there are sluts.

Maybe more to the point than it being "unnatural," men are emotionally used to and invested in chasing women. When a woman is easy to get, that kind of "short-circuits" that drive, it just feels too easy, but it creates an emotional conflict because why wouldn't you take advantage of it to get what you want? So the resort is to see the woman as "dirty" and/or immoral.

It makes sense for that to be a reason, especially before paternity tests existed. The bottom line is that men and women are different and sex is different for men and women. No amount of roastie and white knight crying will change that. Sex is an achievement for men so a higher body count is something for men to brag about. They're also hardwired to spread their seed. Women choose to have sex so having sex isn't an achievement for women. Women are also more hardwired for pair-bonding. Women having high body counts is a turn off because it means they're used goods and have questionable decision-making. Men want females in their prime not roasties/whores. It's also a red flag because either she doesn't want to keep a man or can't keep a man. Women with lower body counts have higher sexual market value. Men who want a serious relationship want a woman who takes relationships seriously not some cock carousel-riding slut/whore. Women will always be judged for their sexual decisions/past no matter how much they may hate it. It's just the way it is. Too bad for the butthurt roasties and white knights who can't handle that fact.

I’ve heard this before, and it’s true: men can never be 100% sure the child their partner gave birth to is theirs and not the milkman’s. Historically, the only things they’ve had to go by are the honesty of their partner, and any shred of family resemblance. (Personally, I think women who lie to men about them being their child’s father are despicable.)

I always laugh at men who’ve been TRAPPED into fatherhood against their will. “All I did was have unprotected sex three times with this harlot I met in the pub and now I’m expected to pay for/bring up her child for the next two decades!” If you don’t want to be a parent it’s very simple to prevent that from ever happening. If you can’t trust the person you’re having sex with, maybe think about how risky having unprotected sex with a bunch of strangers is. Don’t expect a drunk stranger you met an hour ago to take responsibility for your future. BUT, I don’t believe that is the reason men hate promiscuous women. I think it’s more to do with him being the first. Because if all women are innocent virgins, she doesn’t have anything to gauge how shit you are in bed. How little you’ll do to satisfy her. How clueless you are. How small your penis is. How just shooting your load and rolling over isn’t really a very nice thing to do. The male ego is a fragile, fragile thing when it comes to their little chum and their ‘performance’. A lot of them really don’t like that they’re being compared to the bloke from the gym last weekend. So they call women whores and sluts and whatever else for their own benefit. To protect themselves.