Merida · 11 answers · 3y

What's worse? Being a bad person or someone with no personality? Explain your answer, please

Omg no personality, hands down. Just kidding. Being a bad person is worse. Much worse.

I guess it depends on how you define 'worse' - there are plenty of awful people who will do better with relationships than the no personality person

Being a bad person. Having no personality isn’t that terrible, you’re not gonna hurt someone, maybe you’ll bore some people but no one has been harmed with that 🤷🏻‍♀️
But being a bad person means you’ve basically chosen to be that way and you’re fine with it.

Being a bad person. You have a choice to be bad. You have a choice in upping your personality stakes too. Nobody’s born with the innate ability to make small talk at cocktail parties. Like everything else in life, it’s a skill you learn.

While a bad person is fixed in the bad corner, a person with no personality can be expected with a bit of a chance in any corner, so also in the good corner. But we as social beings value predictability higher than being on the right side a few times. Not that I would necessarily judge that way, but a group might do it.

being a bad person is worse. somebody with no personality isn't necessarily hurting anyone. someone who's a bad person is making the world a worse place. the only argument that could be made for the person with no personality is that it's probably worse for him than how bad being a bad person is for them. because no girl will like him, and nobody can truly love him, but girls like and people love bad people all the time. but besides that, anybody who says what's worse is having no personality is an immoral git who only cares about being entertained.

Retrospring uses Markdown for formatting

*italic text* for italic text

**bold text** for bold text

[link](https://example.com) for link