Vegan would be worse short term, but with scientific advancements can grow into being tolerable or even adequate. Paleo, by its very nature, remains static. The only question is whether we can make vegan food that isn't terrible within the next decade, but I'm willing to take those odds. So, vegan.
Paleo, I think it's more natural / suited to the human body (given that it's what we evolved on), and veganism is too strict for me, and you have to be careful with getting enough of certain nutrients. On the other hand, I saw an article the other day where someone was arguing against the paleo diet and pointed out that prehistoric people only lived to be about 30 years old. I doubt that's really due to their diet, though. Most Americans eat much worse and live much longer anyway. Also, one reason I might want to pick vegan is because eating animals and animal products is unethical because of the living conditions of those animals.
[03-18-19]
Paleo would be healthier, but I'm veggie, I think that means I'm eating salad—THE END. That would get a bit monotonous.
I'm most of the way to veggie, but I do cheese at most every meal and possibly in between. Mayo's a problem. Milk in chocolate among other things. I'd like to 'try' vegan, but that would be a lot of bother. I'm already taking the B-12 so that's something.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolithic_diet
No legumes? This could be a problem for me. Maybe I couldn't do this.
https://www.nomeatathlete.com/vegetarian-paleo-diet/
I can sort of, if I eat a ton of eggs? I don't like eggs that much. I feel bad eating the eggs I do, because I know* too much about hatcheries.
So vegan, I suppose.
Vegan. Too easy.
Retrospring uses Markdown for formatting
*italic text* for italic text
**bold text** for bold text
[link](https://example.com) for link
