Is a woman who can't cook less attractive?
Arguably, anyone who can do (insert x here) is more attractive than those who can't. I personally am no good at cooking, because I grew up with a maid who's always taken care of everything for me and the family. I'd like to think if someone were a decent person, they wouldn't judge a person's level of attraction based on their present incapability of doing something, but rather their willingness/openness to learn. I'd much rather be with someone who's patient with me as I slowly adopt a new skill versus a complete asshole that's already jumped to conclusions about my worthiness as a person. Foh with that shit.
Anybody who can't is less attractive.
But what are you defining as ''cooking''? I count it as cooking if you're just sticking things in the oven and heating things up.
But if you mean cooking from scratch, yeah I can't cook.
(lol) Isn't it all in the presentation though? >https://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/meme14-5bc49ba79d23b__700.jpg
Nah, isn't it a stereotype that women who do not cook are the most sexy ones? Though some guys seem to fancy mum-types as a stereotype, who do all the sexy cooking and baking in their kitchen with an apron showing a deep cleavage.
Not for me.
She is a failed woman
No offense, but only women whose bodies are made out of wads of iridescent silk shantung and fondant peonies are attractive. This is related to the question, 'cause if you are performing a task like cooking you obviously aren't made of wads of iridescent silk shantung and fondant peonies. How do I know? Because you have a skeleton and probably a brain that helps you remember to stir stuff. I don't make the rules
Retrospring uses Markdown for formatting
*italic text*
for italic text
**bold text**
for bold text
[link](https://example.com)
for link