depends on how you interpret it! i've usually settled on istp, but i might be overcorrecting based on how a lot of people think they're in--. and once you get into the functions and “the letters actually have a strange and unintuitive connection to the actual mechanics underneath it. you fool” i start wondering if this is even a good metric for human personality.

i do think istp is still most accurate, even accounting for function-stacking and all of that, but i think mbti is best as just one of many interesting lenses to look through, or a fun system to play with.

...anyway! i'm also rcuai (maybe leaning rcoai because i sway wildly between the two poles of conscientiousness) in the big 5.