Unknown creature · 13d
Tab, if you were to wear trousers, would they cover basically your entire body? Or would you have effectively two pairs of trouser legs joined by fabric?
Tabitha: Honestly I'd probably just have them for the hind legs. I see no reason to have pants over the fore legs since there's no bits there to cover up, and that's the whole reason anyone wears pants in the first place. Plus, it means the shape of pants aren't drastically altered, just shifted slightly. Why try to re-invent the wheel, y'know?
