[03-09-19]

youtu.be/jWI8w9kLAks

'believe' … (?)

No, I don't 'believe', BUT that's a guess. I'm no climatologist. All sides lie about this. When science becomes so politicized, you can't get straight answers, it's about dogma and sides.

Assuming 'significant impact', does this outweigh the technological benefits?

What's to be done? People are already working on cheaper, cleaner, energy sources because money. If climate is not an issue, pollution and cost still are. Does it matter what people believe in this instance if we're heading for the same/similar outcomes? I suppose the environmental hysteria could be taken down a notch or two. People like to favor avoid bad hypothetical outcomes over dealing with real current concerns, that seems like some big problems.