Sergius. · 10 answers · 2y
Let me tell you a story. A woman was near her death due to cancer. There was a drug that might save her and it was a form of radium that the scientist recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, yet the scientist charged the drug ten times what the drug cost him to make. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to borrow money from everyone he knew, but he barely got half of the drug price. He told the scientist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the scientist refused because he already discovered the drug and was going to make money from it. Feeling desperate, Heinz broke into the lab and steal the drug.
Now, do you think Heinz should have broken into the lab and stolen the drug for his wife? Why or why not?
Radium, the only chemical composition to help his wife to recover. Why is he not looking for it outside? How does the scientist discovered it?
But well, we're in a case whether he should or should not. When the rage is mixed with reality where he should save his wife. Then the answer is yes. He should and will do the stealing from the laboratory. All maybe raw calculated in a short-period of time because of the dying time. And he would do that with of the risk probability. If he wouldn't, then might be waiting for the exact time together with his beloved wife.
The question is, is it really beloved or because she's the only one he had?
