hello, your document addendum noted that you "have been forwarded a blank copy of the contract" for AmaZine's agency and that you are "publicly disclosing this document". I do appreciate the work you're doing to combat the agency, but given that this document was actually linked for transparency in their own publicly available response, this phrasing makes it seem that you didn't closely read their response to notice this fairly important detail. as a result, readers of both documents may wonder what else you missed in your response. this can also be considered directly libelous as you are insinuating that at the time of posting your addendum on 12/30, there is no way to access the contract beyond what you have shared because AmaZines does not value transparency; this can be directly disproven by the timestamps of their own posts on social media and therefore taken as an attack on their character. I hope you're able to correct the phrasing so your document's integrity is maintained! I also encourage you to re-read their document closely (and click all available links, read through screenshots, etc.) to ensure no other details were missed and your document remains both thorough and accurate.