I thought maybe the reason he's not already been banned was because he doesn't send his bullshit directly to people and provoke them to react. I think the bans are earned, I just seems like banning is a futile exercise in these instances because reprimanding someone who has no intention of changing their behavior and is likely to just come back a little worse every time seems like more trouble than it's worth from my POV. I wouldn't think it was unfair if he was banned for holocaust denial, of course. He provides a service though, he says heinous things outright that a few other users here won't say even though they agree. So those who follow him and "like" those answers, and anyone who defends the actual content of his posts, they tell one on themselves that they probably wouldn't have otherwise.