Teo · 11 answers · 5y

In your onion, should professional workplaces should lax their policies/attitudes towards hiring employees with visible tattoos? elaborate because yes/no answers are boring, ty!

Yes, because I like tattoos and professional workplaces really should be forming their policies around what I like.

If the job really demands it, say for instance being a spook, I can see a reason.

The potential employer is free to discriminate against it if it's a personal choice,
but must atleast give their reasoning clear as day if they want to drop your resume because of your sick tats.

I think they should do whatever they want to do. They probably have their reasons for being as strict as they are about tattoos. I'm guessing having employees with tattoos lowers customers' impressions of the business, and perhaps rightly so. I'd guess another factor is probably that people without tattoos are likely more civilized, serious about their job, or whatever.

Yes, if it's within reason. I can't imagine someone covered in face tats being sent out on business trips to represent their company. No one should be burdened with someone else's poor decisions.

That being said I know you've got some ink on you, I can tell you from experience it's not a disqualifyer. We've got some business ladies here at work with arm tats and they show them off sometimes.

I don't know exactly how their policies/attitudes look like but I will say that I am not a fan of tattoos. Plus it is unhealthy and to give it even more power is a wrong step. Sure it is a personal decision and if you have the feeling you need to do that to your skin, be my guest but to give it more power than it already has, is no good. It might even open the door for tattoos for pre-teens or whatever, we can never know.

Retrospring uses Markdown for formatting

*italic text* for italic text

**bold text** for bold text

[link](https://example.com) for link